January 24, 2013 Trading Up
Star Trek III: The Search for Spock was the first videotape I ever bought. In fact, I still have that copy, and any time I run across it I am surprised again by how hefty it is. As time went on, videotapes got lighter (weight-wise, not brightness-wise), but that tape was the heaviest one I ever owned. I doubt it’s still playable, but I haven’t tried playing it because who has a VCR anymore?
Several years later, I bought Star Trek III again. It was still a videotape, but it was part of a set of all six of the original Trek movies, and they were in letterboxed widescreen. Plus, the packaging for all six, when lined up correctly, had a picture of the Enterprise on the spines. Worth it.
A few years later, I bought Star Trek III again, this time on DVD. The series was being released little by little in special 2-disc editions with tons of extras, and I was buying them as they came out.
Then, of course, a little over a year ago I bought Star Trek III again, this time as part of a Blu-Ray (BD) set of the six movies.
Here’s the thing: you probably don’t even like Star Trek III. I do, but I’ll admit that a big part of that is nostalgia. It’s the 4th-best OG Trek movie (II, VI, IV, III, I, V, in case you were wondering), but it has a bunch of Vulcan stuff in it that I find (for the lack of a better word) fascinating. But that’s not even the real reason for me buying it four times.
The easiest answer is technology, of course. As I’ve mentioned, most homes don’t even have a VCR anymore, so it would be difficult to watch my VHS copies of Star Trek III. Plus, videotape degrades every time it’s played and even when it’s just sitting there, so eventually I wouldn’t be able to watch it anyway. DVD doesn’t degrade as quickly as VHS, nor is it susceptible to many of the same damagers (temperature, storage position), but it does still degrade. I can still play DVDs I’ve had for ten years, but will I be able to play them in twenty more? And that’s even assuming there’s hardware still available that can play them.
DVD is an upgrade from videotape in more than just longevity, though. The format allows for more information to be stored in less space, so better picture and sound quality account for some of the draw, but the extra features that will fit on a disc are a huge draw as well — even though many of those never get watched!
BD isn’t as huge a jump from DVD that DVD was from videotape. I mean, to someone who knows all the ins, outs, and bitrates it might be, but to the end user it’s functionally the same. Cloverfield was the first movie I ever watched on Blu-Ray. I was expecting to blown away by the picture quality (because shakycam looks so much better in hi-def!), but what I really was blown away by was the sound. I remember being amazed at how much clearer it was on my exact same equipment that I had been using for DVD.
When I first got a BD player, I determined I would not rebuy movies I already had on DVD unless it were something that really warranted it. “Warranted it” was defined in my head as “big action movies or things with awesome special effects.” I knew going in that I was going to rebuy the Matrix movies, for instance. And most superhero movies. But I sure didn’t need a BD of When Harry Met Sally, because how does that help anything? Oh, and of course anything new I’d buy would be on BD, because that just made sense. It doesn’t sound like my system makes much sense, but it was very clear to me how it worked, and I could imagine no other way.
Until recently, anyway. In the last several months I’ve changed my position somewhat. Now it makes sense to me that if it’s a movie I love, I should want to see it the best possible way. Again, that just makes sense, and it saddens me that I didn’t realize that until just now, but that’s how it goes sometimes. I can still make other excuses as to why I want to buy a BD upgrade to a DVD I already have (“It’s so cheap!” being the biggest one), but I’m starting to settle on the “because I love this movie” reason without feeling bad about it.
Frankly, there are some upgrades I couldn’t wait to get because the DVD was so awful. I know there’s a name for this, but I get confused about all of that, so I’ll just explain it. Both my DVDs of 10 Things I Hate about You and Grosse Pointe Blank were formatted for a 4:3 TV, but letterboxed widescreen inside that 4:3 window. That means that I had black bars on the sides and the top, reducing the movie to less than a third of the available screen. Now, sure, there are zoom options available that will make it fill the screen, but it’s not the same and looks…not great. Neither of these movies fit the “big action” or “awesome special effects” bill. I love Grosse Pointe Blank (seriously, it’s probably in my All Time Top 5), but I only like 10 Things I Hate about You. When Grosse Pointe Blank was released in August of last year, I bought it the day of, even though it was pretty lousy as far as BDs go: NO extras at all! But it fills the whole screen now, so that’s still an upgrade. I didn’t like 10 Things well enough to spend a lot of money on it, but I found it at Target for $5 and that seemed about right. I haven’t watched the new copy yet, but I assume it, too, fills the whole screen.
I know everybody is all about digital only these days – I’ve gotten more than a few aghast eyerolls when I tell people I don’t like buying digital-only versions of movies. It’s not that I don’t like having digital versions, I certainly do. It’s that I don’t like having digital-only versions. “One good EMP will take out that whole collection!” I’m fond of saying. (Yes, I know that a good EMP will wipe out anything I’d be able to play a BD on, too. Leave me alone.) There’s something about having an alphabetized collection of discs that makes a difference for me. If it’s ones and zeroes, what do I own? If it’s a disc, I can loan it out, I can hold it, I can see it. I know that makes me old school/lame/a geezer, but that’s how it is. I know the industry is moving towards digital, but I’m still looking forward to the next format I’ll be able to buy Star Trek III in.
Written by: Mark
- 15 comments
- Posted under Movies
Permalink # Derek said
I mostly buy moves on DVD for two reasons. First I don’t really care much about 480 vs 1080 (we don’t even own a 1080 TV, it’s still 720p). Second I rip all my DVDs to a personal media server as ISOs (because I want to keep all the menu’s and extras intact) and then steam them to my TV and I don’t have the HD capacity for a ton of ripped blu-rays.
So I’m still in the “blu ray has to really be worth it” camp. So far that’s only been true for 5 movies.
Permalink # Mark said
On occasion I have ripped some of my DVDs, and that is the one downside to BD, since I have no way to rip those.
Permalink # bd said
I keep almost buying a bluray player. There’s things I want, but I’m too cheap.
Permalink # Mark said
I used a bunch of store credit to get a PS3 for my BD player, as it brought that down to about the same price as other players at the time. I figured I might as well get something that also plays games, but I’ve literally only played like 3 games on it.
Permalink # Mike said
No bluray player in our house either. DVD + Streaming so far has been enough for us, not looking forward to the day when the combo isn’t viable, so hopefully DVD remains backwards compatible for a while!
Permalink # Mark said
It would be weird for them to remove that functionality, I think!
Permalink # Mike said
Never underestimate business needs to save costs (codec licensing) or increase revenue (by forcing the Trade Up). :)
Recent example: MS dropping DVD playback from default Windows 8 functionality to save on codec costs
Permalink # Mark said
I didn’t know they had done that :(
Permalink # Michael said
Yeah, not included by default… Do you have win8? I have a media center key I don’t need and will expire at end of month
Permalink # Mark said
I have Win8 on a couple of machines, but not one that I’ve used my WMC key on yet. I got the reminder today, too :)
Permalink # Justin said
Man, I could write a response as big as your original post…
I am doing the same thing! I’m actually more likely to get a BD of something that I already own on DVD than something I don’t, because I know I can then sell the DVD, making the purchase more affordable. I upgraded Clerks most recently, and sold the tenth anniversary DVD for just a few dollars less than I spent on the BD.
We’ve had the conversation before about anamorphic DVDs. I have gotten rid of all of my non-anamorphic, and I’m planning on replacing as much as I can. Boondock Saints and Short Circuit are good examples here.
And also there are some BDs that have alternate cuts of the film that aren’t on the DVD I have. Boondock Saints, again, and The Professional (which I only had the original French cut of).
And sometimes DVDs don’t have subtitles! This really surprised me! I replaced Snatch for this reason alone.
I just went and looked, and I believe that Stargate is the only film I’ve owned on all three: VHS, DVD, and BD.
Do you use blu-ray.com Price Tracker? It’s great for sniping these things while they’re at their lowest price. I actually upgraded my From Dusk Til Dawn when it was only $4 on BD.
Permalink # Mark said
I had not used the price tracker, but I will definitely look into it. Seriously, there are very few movies I’ll buy new anymore. I buy used movies 90% (or more) of the time.
Permalink # d4v34x said
I still have a VCR. But you probably suspected that.
Permalink # Mark said
I wouldn’t have guessed it, but it doesn’t surprise me!
Permalink # » Surgery Movies Follow-Up zwolanerd said
[…] Things I Hate About You – Finally got around to replacing my awful DVD with a Blu-Ray, so I had to check it out. It’s still a good movie, and it’s fun to see […]