Skip to content

zwolanerd

I guess I just like liking things

Side note: sometimes I sing “DLC!” to the tune of AC/DC’s “TNT.” Now you can, too!

His goggles alone are worth $20

His goggles alone are worth $20

I both love and hate downloadable content. It’s a great way to spend more time in a game I like, but it’s also more money. A $60 game quickly turns into an $80+ game, and I already didn’t like spending $60 on a game. I know that the price per hour of enjoyment is generally much lower than a movie, but the initial cost still gives me pause.

Aside: I wanted to do the math on that to see if my feelings are correct. Going to see a movie in the theater usually costs me $6.25 (I try to go between 4p-6p when it’s cheaper), so a 2-hour movie costs me $3.13 per hour. Assassin’s Creed IV would’ve cost me $60 if I hadn’t borrowed it from a friend, and I put at least 110 hours into it (which, might I add, is ridiculous). The cost per hour there is $1.83, a much better deal. It gets tricky when you consider a game like 007 Legends, a game I paid $20 for and spent 7-8 hours on, but didn’t like it at all. The cost then becomes a little like dividing by zero.

Many games have a “Season Pass,” usually a $20 charge, which means “any DLC we release you can get for no additional fee.” It’s ingenious, really. If I had to pay $80 at the store for the game and any future DLC, it’s likely I would never buy it. After I’ve bought the game and fallen in love with it, though, the dangled carrot of a new squadmate in Mass Effect 3 or a level and boss fight against Mr. Freeze in Arkham Origins is too much to resist.

A lot of people gripe about DLC being a “cash grab,” a concept I find a little odd. They put the work into it, they should get paid, right? The most common complaint is “it should have been in the game already,” and that’s a hard one to argue either way, I think, except in one particular situation. Sometimes the game will offer DLC and once you’ve paid, it will download a file that’s usually around 108kb. That filesize is code for “the content is already on the disc, this file just means you can access it now.” This is the sort of thing that can make a person pass out from choking on his own spittle. It’s not new, it’s not something that needed more work, it’s on the disc already.  This is the one instance I can agree with the “cash grab” accusers.

Two of my favorite ever DLC packs were for Mass Effect 3. “From the Ashes” gives you a new squadmate (with more story, of course) and taking him with me on missions provided some neat information and more than a few laughs. “Citadel” is my all-time #1 piece of DLC. It gave Commander Shepard a chance to spend some last time with each of her squadmates and even throw a party at her very snazzy new apartment. It had moments of hilarity and heartbreak, and it was a perfect addition to the series.

But the funny thing is, I never bought a Season Pass for Mass Effect 3. I don’t know if one wasn’t available, or if I didn’t understand the concept, or what, but I ended up buying both of those, plus Leviathan, and I still have plans to buy Omega. All told, I have spent more on Mass Effect 3 in the last two years than I’ve spent on dental care in the same time period.

The beauty and the agony of DLC, right there.

 

Tags: , ,

“Snog Marry Avoid” works on a sound premise – a natural look is better. The show claims to target people who are too reliant on fakery – fake tans, fake eyelashes etc. They also target “fashion disasters” and as a fashion disaster myself, I’m interested to see where they take that. They can have my cardigans when they prise them from my cold dead hands!

An alarmingly perky woman is striding down a street in England, shouting at the camera. Originally, this was a studio show, but now they’re out in the streets with “Pod” – a large shiny shipping container which has a sarcastic computer inside to belittle and deride those selected for make overs. Sorry, make unders – the idea is to tone people down, not shine them up. The “on the road” episode has landed in Nottingham, a fact Ellie the host tells Pod in a high pitched screech. Pod sends Ellie out to find people who are rich in fakery.

But as we know, it was Jem who was truly outrageous

But as we know, it was Jem who was truly outrageous

There’s a bit of a vox pop where people explain that Nottingham is full of low cut dresses, white lipstick and people not wearing undies. Now we meet one of the lucky ladies who are up for a make over. Johanna introduces herself as “The most outrageous girl.” She dares us, as a group, to do something about it. As proof of her outrageousness, she dons a pair of bunny ears. Her look is “crazy,” if by crazy you mean “tee-shirts and shorts.” Which, personally, I don’t. If she came to me with a small chicken on her head and wearing a dress woven from bus tickets, then we could discuss crazy. Mostly, from the clips of her walking around town, her look appears to be “cold.” She says she’s mostly fake, including tan, hair extensions, eyelashes and make up.

Johanna’s boyfriend, Mike, is kind of over the whole “Taking 3 hours to get ready” and also having to do everything around the house because Johanna needs the time to fake tan and make up. She uses fake tan daily, and makes all of Mike’s clothes and furniture orange as a result. Lorna, Johanna’s sister, likens Johanna to a wanna be porn star and is looking forward to seeing Johanna as herself, rather than under three coats of foundation (it is actually three coats of foundation).

Ellie turns up to meet Johanna, who is standing in a spray tan booth. Ellie thinks Johanna looks like a gingerbread man, and Johanna is pleased. Johanna is explaining that she feels it’s time she really looked at who she is, and perhaps gain some sophistication. I am distracted by Ellie’s wide eyed open mouthed smile. I … I’m worried she’s an alien sent to devour women with fake tans. Run Johanna! Run!

Johanna goes in to see Pod (which apparently stands for “Personal Overhaul Device”). “I’m Johanna”, says Johanna. “Johanna the fake tanner?” says Pod in a strident computerised voice. Someone spent ages writing that. “Why aren’t you dressed?” Pod demands while the camera pans up Johanna’s outfit, which, admittedly, is basically underwear.

Now we get down to the nitty gritty. The “general public” have been asked, having been shown a photo of Johanna, would they like to snog, marry or avoid her? The ultimate goal is “marry,” because it indicates that the person in question looks nice enough to marry (I’ll ignore the part about personalities for now, it’ll be in my wrap up – predictably!). Johanna is shown clips of various men saying how unattractive she is, and the verdict is “avoid.”

No fakery accepted! (Hair dye is okay though - loopholes!)

No fakery accepted! (Hair dye is okay though – loopholes!)

Phase two is “Deep Cleanse.” Johanna removes all her jewelry, hair extensions and fake lashes and is given a bunch of make up wipes to clean off her face with. After a make under, which includes a nice frock, a hair colouring and some light make up, Johanna does look much better. She seems pleased with the make under, but it’s time to ask random men in the street what they think. The first guy says “I would marry her because she’s got great hair.” Wow. I can’t even begin to think about that. The next chap just says “Yeah snog her!” I’d just swoon.

Time for the reveal, Johanna is sent to a bar to walk down the catwalk. The voice over wants to know what her boyfriend will think of his new “top totty” girlfriend. Mike is delighted, and the crowd goes wild. Ellie wants to know if Johanna will still get the attention she loved so much, and Mike jumps in with “Course she will!” 10 boyfriend points to that man please. With Johanna vowing to never fake tan again, we move on to the next part of the show.

Apparently, Nottingham people like to wear camouflage and it appears in jackets, pants and even hand bags as a sort of city wide fashion. Pod calls for Ellie, because this trend is “ridiculous” although I’m not entirely sure how. To show them how silly they look, Ellie goes out in full camo. She rolls around in the street a bit and letches on some men and asks some ladies about their pants. After this fairly pointless interlude, we meet Claire.

Confession: I like her make up

Confession: I like her make up

Claire, dressed in a skin tight full body shiny blue catsuit, explains her look is a mix of everything she loves – cupcakes, drag queens, clouds and crystals. Claire’s boyfriend, Louis, looks slightly dazzled by the whole concept of Claire, but does manage to say he thinks she looks weird. Claire’s mother, Kate, says Claire’s look isn’t really her taste, but she does admire Claire’s confidence.

While doing her make up, Claire points out that there’s gaps on her face, so she holds up an offcut of lace and paints make up over it, stenciling the lace pattern onto her forehead and cheek. I like it.

Inside Pod, Claire says she bought her outfit from a figure skater and thinks Pod can’t make her look better anyway. Time for the clips of people talking about Claire. One chap says “I would avoid her because she looks like she’s just come off an ice skating rink.” Claire laughs and wants to know what’s wrong with ice skating. I feel this is a fair question.

Sad Claire is sad

Sad Claire is sad

Deep cleanse time. After losing her eyelashes and earrings, we get the make under. Claire is given plain dark hair, and an okay dress, but she’s unhappy. Claiming she looks like a celery stick, she also fusses with her newly boring hair. She quite likes the make up. The new vox pop result is “Snog.”

Back at the pub, Claire says again how much she hates the new look, but her mum is delighted. Her boyfriend isn’t there for some reason. Claire says she’s off home to pop some glitter on and get rid of the hideous dress.

Before the show ends, we meet with Claire and Johanna again to see if they kept their new looks. Johanna did, Claire (colour me shocked) did not. The day after her make under she dyed her hair blue. She’s wearing less make up though. Johanna is still enjoying her new look and has landed a job, and is overall happier to be less orange.

I’m going to start with “Pod.” As a concept, it’s probably okay – a computer that scans people and explains why they’re so hideously dressed. The “witty remarks” are terrible and clumsy though. In trying to be really catty, it comes off obnoxious and grating.

Now I’m going to move on to the whole concept of the Snogging, Marrying or Avoiding. These are the three options. There isn’t a “She looks nice” or “She looks like fun.” You either want to snog her, marry her, or avoid her (to be fair, there are other episodes where one of the make under people is a chap, so it’s not entirely based on the decorative aspect of women, just mostly). It’s bad enough that these are the three categories in the first place, couple that with the idea that it’s somehow a good thing that 70% of people asked would cheerfully snog you without knowing you and I just don’t know where we’re going as a species.  I suppose it comes down to “Is this person attractive?” which is a less snappy title for a TV show but also less creepy. It’s very creepy to have random strangers rating anyone by how “snoggable” they are.

On being told that 90% of people asked would “avoid” her, Claire said “Whatever, we’re not supposed to care what other people think are we?” and she’s right. Johanna did end up happier in herself I think after scraping off some of the fake tan, but Claire wasn’t happy. She thought she looked boring, and she wants to look fun and have fun with her appearance. Also she’s seventeen, and I promise you that by the time she’s 20 she’ll probably have a whole new look anyway.

Which is kind of another issue I have with the show. Claire is 17, Johanna is 19 and it’s just kind of sad to have two young people hauled up onto national TV for mocking, regardless of how they dress.  That this sort of thing is “entertainment” is pretty sad really.

Tags:

Give him a crowbar and he's Gordon Freeman

Give him a crowbar and he’s Gordon Freeman. A mean, mean Gordon Freeman.

This is a list in progress, as we’re only halfway through season three, but it’s occupying a lot of my brainspace these days. I don’t know that there’s anything I can say about the show that hasn’t already been said, so instead of trying I thought I’d do a list. I don’t think there are any spoilers here, other than a couple of these characters don’t show up right away.

Again, these are based on 3.5 seasons, so I know these characters have a long way to go. Maybe I’ll revisit the list after we’re done with the series.

7. Hank – Hank’s very single-minded in his pursuit of drug dealers, and you really have to respect him for that. Yes, he makes bad choices here and there, but show me a character on this show that hasn’t. In spite of it, Hank’s the sort of guy I wouldn’t want to spend a lot of time around.

6. Walt, Jr. – Okay, I take it back: I don’t know that Walt, Jr., has made any bad choices — at least, not on the level of everyone else. He’s angry a lot, but it’s hard to blame him for that since no one’s telling him what’s going on ever. I feel really, really bad in advance for when (I assume) he finds out what his dad’s been doing. It’s going to hurt him a lot.

5. Saul – I knew a lot about the show before ever seeing an episode, but Saul surprised me. I knew who he was so I knew (sort of) his role in the story, but I didn’t expect that he would crack me up so much. I’m sure he comes to a bad end (just like I assume most characters in this show will), but he’s cracking me up in the meantime.

4. Mike – I knew him first from this season’s Community, but for most people it was the other way around. Here’s a guy who gets things done, and I like that about him. And that “things” encompasses many, many different jobs, but he’s matter-of-fact, no-nonsense, and appears to know more than he lets on.

3. Gus – I’m just now starting to see how ruthless he is, but setting aside the things he’s doing, I like the way he does them, if that makes sense. His calm exterior and his desire for things to be “just so” make him very compelling. I already know how things turn out for him, but I’m very, very interested in learning more about him and seeing how he gets there.

2. Jesse – Hardly have I ever felt worse about a TV character than I feel for Jesse. Sure, I get that most of his problems come from the choices he’s made, but, man, this guy!  Who has had worse days than him?

1. Walt – Walt is the reason this show is so amazing. How the writers have made me not only care about him but root for him in the middle of him making terrible decisions will forever make me jealous. He’s a criminal who is hurting everyone around him, but I just want him to escape from whatever his current predicament is so he can get back to making meth, and that’s a terrible thing for me to want him to do.

I know there’s a severe lack of female characters on this list, but it’s not my fault. Marie is fine, but she’s not really affecting me one way or the other, and there’s no way in the world Skyler is making any list that isn’t titled “Characters that are the worst, the absolute worst,” even if I can’t fully explain to myself why she’s the worst. Aside from the two of them, there are very few other females on the show.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tags: ,

I was driving the other day and Sara Bareilles’ song “Brave” came on. I like the song so I was singing along a bit. I must’ve zoned out a little bit, because after a while I realized I was singing along to Katy Perry’s “Roar.” Now, I did not imagine “Brave,” it really was on. It’s just that at some point “Brave” ended and “Roar” came on. I’ll never be able to prove it, but I suspect some wisenheimer put something together that segued from one to another to make a point.

There was a minor flap when Katy Perry released “Roar” over its similarity to “Brave,” but these things tend to be more coincidences rather than conspiracies. They are similar both in sound and in message, but I’d never heard them one right after the other before. It amused me to realize what had happened.

Don’t take my word for it, judge for yourself:

Two Mondays in a row with Katy Perry stuff? Weird.

Tags:

Aveline de Grandpré is not going to put up with any of your guff

Aveline de Grandpré is not going to put up with any of your guff

One of the games I’m playing these days is Assassin’s Creed Liberation. It’s set in the latter half of 1700 in New Orleans and Mexico, and the main character is Aveline de Grandpré. She is of French and African heritage, born to a French father and an African slave mother. Aveline was raised in a wealthy environment and was later recruited to the Assassin’s movement. Her goals in the game are to uncover a mystery, defeat the Templars, and free slaves. Throughout the game, she uses three different personas: lady, slave, and Assassin. Each persona has different abilities (the Lady can’t run up walls and use a whip, but she can defend herself when being mugged and she can go to fancy parties; the Slave can blend in more places, but can’t use “charm” on fancy gentlemen; and the Assassin can run around, climb on things, and use any weapon there is, but she can’t go anywhere without being eyed suspiciously) and each persona has a specific set of goals to accomplish.

Right off the bat I don’t know what to make of this “persona” mechanic. I’m uncomfortable playing the Slave persona because of how horrible slavery is and especially was in 1765. Is the game trying to make any sort of statement about how a person dressed and acting differently will be accepted into vastly different social groups? I suspect it was more of a “here’s a way to break the gameplay up a little differently” decision, but I honestly can’t tell.

All that to set this up: one of many things the main character in Assassin’s Creed games can do is pickpocket people. If you want, you can just go out into the city and do nothing but pickpocket people all day long. You’ll get 15-50 monetary units most times, and if you’re needing some cash to buy more poison darts, it can be just the thing for you. Like most of your abilities in AC games, you are directed to pickpocket a particular someone first, both to advance the storyline but also to introduce you to the fact that you can do it. Once I’d met that goal and was free to pickpocket wherever and whomever I wanted, I quickly found that I would only pickpocket rich white dudes. You can tell the rich people from the poor people by their clothes, and a white guy in a top hat might as well have a target on his pockets as far as my version of Aveline is concerned. She’s never going to rob a slave, and it has nothing to do with how much money she’d be able to pickpocket from a slave versus how much she’ll get from a top hatted fellow. It has everything to do with kinship.

This might surprise you to learn about me, but I was never a French-African slave girl/assassin in the 1700s. There is nothing in my background that even remotely resembles what that experience would have been like. My one connection to a French-African slave girl/assassin in the 1700s is that we are both humans. That one connection, of course, is all anyone needs to treat another person with respect, but it doesn’t tell you that person’s story at all.  Further point of fact, just because you’ve met one French-African slave girl/assassin in the 1700s it doesn’t mean you immediately know every French-African slave girl/assassin in the 1700s’ story, and it’s rude of you to think you do. Assumptions are not your friend when meeting new people.

Right about now you might be thinking, “Wait, he doesn’t have any connection to her at all because she isn’t real.” You’re not only right, you’ve also just made my exact point for me, thank you: stories are important. Whether it’s a book, a movie, a videogame, or a story you’ve heard someone tell, you’re getting the chance to learn something about other people. I’ve never been a Jewish person during World War II, but watching Schindler’s List can give me at least a glimpse at what it was like. I’ve never been inside a crack house, but Breaking Bad can verify that I never want to be. And it’s not just the Big Serious Movies that can teach you. We watch Groundhog Day and wonder how we might react in the same circumstance. We watch Sam Malone chase after women but admit to being lonely and unfulfilled. We watch Lucy disguise herself to try out for Ricky’s band so she can share in that part of his life. If my own experience is the only one I judge all other experiences by, I’m going to turn into… well, we’ve all seen that guy in real life and in movies.

Movies, books, and TV give you the chance to see it and glean information. Games give you both the chances to see it and to choose it. In most RPGs, I create a version of myself. In those games, it’s a chance to (within the guidelines of the game, anyway) see how I would react to extraordinary circumstances. (In these instances, it’s very frustrating to not have a choice that reflects what I want to do!) In games that follow an unchangeable script it’s a chance to see how others would make those decisions, while at the same being forced to be the one making those decisions.

I’ve been fascinated by this concept lately. I know it’s not revolutionary or anything, but it’s been on my mind a lot. We side with characters, we urge them to make different choices, we get angry that something-or-other happened – we get tied up in stories because we either relate or we want to. And if we’re paying attention, we can learn about the lives of others and realize we have a lot more in common than we maybe thought.

Tags: