April 1, 2014 Tuesday 10: Movies of 1993
Considering today is April 1, I wanted to do something fool-related, but none of my ideas were panning out (the best of which was “Mr. T Roles,” but I hadn’t seen enough of them to do a whole list). So the fallback is the next year in our “Movies of ____” series. You’ll have to get your fool-related content elsewhere!
10. In the Line of Fire – This one made #3 on my list of Rene Russo movies. I’ll never be quite sure about the “romance” between the two leads, but the movie is good regardless.
9. Dragon: The Bruce Lee Story – One of my favorite biopics. It plays a little fast and loose with the facts (like most biopics), but the main points are there. I’ll always be fascinated by Bruce Lee and I thought the mix of fact and mystical elements worked here.
8. Cliffhanger – #4 on my Stallone list.
7. Army of Darkness – My favorite of the Evil Dead movies (so far). More silly than gross is what makes the difference for me.
6. Batman: Mask of the Phantasm – Until The Dark Knight came along, this was the best Batman movie.
5. Last Action Hero – An underappreciated Arnold movie. It isn’t perfect, but it’s a lot of fun.
4. Demolition Man – #3 on my Stallone list and #1 on my Sandra Bullock list. As a side note, Taco Bell serves breakfast now, so the vision of them being the only fast food restaurant in the future is becoming more and more likely.
3. Jurassic Park – I don’t think they’ll ever make a better dinosaur movie than this one.
2. Groundhog Day – On paper this movie sounds impossible to put together. One of my all-time favorites, I’m thinking top 20 for sure.
1. The Nightmare Before Christmas – The Tim Burtonest non-Tim Burton movie ever made. Touching, funny, weird, and a little gross. This one’s a Halloween tradition for me, but I could watch it most any time.
Notable omissions:
- Mrs. Doubtfire – I liked it well enough at the time, but I haven’t felt the need to revisit it in 15+ years.
- The Fugitive – Great movie, certainly (and The Janitor is in it!), but again, I never feel like I need to watch this one again.
- Schindler’s List – This movie would be at the top of my list entitled “Great movies I hope I never have to see again.” It’s powerful, important, and hard to watch.
- Sleepless in Seattle – I should probably give this one another try. It’s been a long time.
- Philadelphia – Never seen it.
- Cool Runnings – Fun, certainly, but is this in anyone’s top ten list?
- Free Willy – Never seen this one, either.
- 6 comments
- Posted under Movies
March 31, 2014 Music Monday: Price Per Song
I can’t tell you how many times I’ve bought an album for one song. I’ll hear that song on the radio or in a movie, then listen to it on YouTube a bunch, and then finally decide to buy the album. My thought process seems to be “This song is worth $10 to me, but maybe there will also be some other song I will like.” It makes no sense, I know, especially in this brave new world where you can listen to the whole album before buying it if you want. That never works for me, though. I need to listen to the whole album through, several times, normally while driving. My daily commute is such that I can usually hear a whole album every day, and my usual practice is to have a new album in the car for a week before passing judgment on it.
So far this year I’ve had good luck. I’ve bought five albums, and three of them have had more than “the one I liked” that I ended up liking. One other I bought because I like Norah Jones’ voice, but I wasn’t bowled over by the album, and one other I’m only in day 3 of its rotation, so I can’t tell yet.
These last two lead into the other issue I have. In the case of Grouplove’s Spreading Rumours album, I knew going in that I loved one song, but I ended up liking 3-4 total songs. Since that album was $10, it’s about $2.50 per song I like. These other two albums, Norah Jones and Karmin, I bought because I liked previous music by them. But what if I don’t end up liking any songs on the Karmin album? I’ve bought two of their albums at a combined cost of around $18 for 20 songs. I like a couple off the first album, so that makes it $9 per song so far. That seems steep until I remember buying things like the Metal Gear Solid soundtrack for the one ending song and paying $20+ for it.
Of course, breaking down a price per song doesn’t seem like the best way to judge something’s merits. After all, paying $9 to go see a two-hour movie is foolish when compared to paying $60 for a videogame I’ll put 100+ hours into. That doesn’t take into account things like “atmosphere” and “experience” that it’s difficult to assign monetary values to.
Surely I can’t be the only one who thinks like this…
March 27, 2014 Movie Round-Up
Sorry for the lack of posts recently, folks. I’ve been sick for about a week. NyQuil helps me sleep, but it gives me fuzzybrain. I seem to be over the worst of it, but I’m still not operating at peak capacity.
The only good thing about being sick is having an excuse to lie around and watch movies. I thought I’d give you a rundown of what I’ve watched in the last week.
The Muppets – My intention was to watch this in anticipation of seeing Muppets Most Wanted, but I still haven’t felt well enough to get to a theater for that one. This is a great Muppet movie, and I’ll fight anyone who says differently. It makes me tear up almost as much as it makes me laugh, though.
Never Say Never Again – I finally got around to seeing the “last” Bond movie, “last” in this sense meaning “the last one I hadn’t seen.” This is the non-official movie that Sean Connery made happen, because… well, there are a lot of theories. It wasn’t great, but it was better than some of the official films.
The Grandmaster – I loved Ip Man and Ip Man 2, and highly recommend them both. Since this movie is about Ip Man (who was Bruce Lee’s wing chun teacher, in case you didn’t know), I assumed it would also be good. It… wasn’t. I mean, it was fine, but it’s nowhere near the quality of the Donnie Yen movies.
Burke & Hare – Two guys in 19th century England who provide cadavers to medical schools by graverobbing… at first. Based on a true story and starring Simon Pegg and Andy Serkis. The final shot in the movie is of the actual Burke’s actual skeleton in the Edinburgh University Medical Museum. Enjoyable enough movie.
Flying Swords of Dragon Gate – I’ll watch random kung fu movies if they look like they have decent production values and a name I recognize. Jet Li was in this one, but there was way too much wire work in it for my tastes. I don’t mind mystical elements in kung fu movies, certainly, but it never looked right in this one and the story was hard to follow (admittedly, this might have been because I was feeling very lousy).
The Way Way Back – I had plans to see this one in the theater but never got the chance. I loved this movie. Sweet and charming without being overly so. Jim Rash wrote and directed this one (with Nat Faxon), and I highly recommend it. Added bonus for me: the title refers to the rear-facing seat in station wagons, a seat I often chose on family vacations.
Ruby Sparks – I don’t know how I feel about this one. I’m pretty sure it’s supposed to be an examination of the Manic Pixie Dream Girl trope, but I don’t know that I can figure out what it’s saying about it. I liked it well enough, but I don’t think I loved it. Very helpful review, I know.
The Good, the Bad, and the Weird – back when I watched The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly, commenter Andrea suggested I try this Korean movie inspired by it. I know this is sacrilege, but I liked this one better than the original, mostly because there was more of a sense of fun throughout it. It’s ridiculous in parts, and unless you know Korean you’ll need to read it, but I quite enjoyed it. Thanks, Andrea!
This weekend, if time, budget, and health allow, I’d like to see Muppets Most Wanted, Noah, and Sabotage. What movies are you hoping to see?
- Leave a comment
- Posted under Movies
March 26, 2014 Dire TV: Tipping Point
(What’s this? Dire TV? I made the rules for this series, and I can break them. This week, I’m doing TV. It’s a world gone topsy turvy.)
Game shows. We’ve all been suckered in while channel surfing. Without meaning to, we’ll watch the whole thing to see if Susan picks the right case on Deal or No Deal, or Alan manages to solve a tricky puzzle on Wheel of Fortune. Some game shows are really edge of your seat stuff – the UK for example produces one called “The Chaser” which pits everyday people against people with incredible general knowledge in the hopes of winning large cash prizes. As far as game shows go, it’s a winner. Tight editing, fast quizzing and the chance to see a bunch of strangers pick up a bundle of cash.
At the other end of the UK Game Show Scale is “Tipping Point.” To explain Tipping Point, I need to ask you if you’ve ever seen one of those machines in an arcade with a pile of coins in front of a sweeping arm. Have you? The idea is you drop in a coin and that coin might be the one to push other coins off the ledge, which you then win. It’s not really a spectator game, but that didn’t stop some TV executives from basing an entire game show on the concept of “Round things being pushed off ledges.”
Sit down. Drink some chamomile tea to ensure you don’t get over excited and join me, please, for a thrilling episode of Tipping Point.
In the studio is a giant version of that coin game, filled with plastic discs. Some discs are white, some are black, but they’re all worth the same amount of money – equality at all times. Along the back of the machine are four “drop zones,” we’ll come to those later. Control yourself. First we have to meet the contestants.
Laura is a Sales Executive from St Albans. Caspian is a Competitive Intelligence Analyst from West Sussex (I don’t know what a competitive intelligence analyst does either). Jo is a Teaching Assistant from Essex. Chris is a Driving Instructor from Stevenage. These are our heroes. One of them will walk away with £10,000. Possibly.
Before that though, they have to work through a convoluted questions, answers and counters system which the host runs through as quickly as he can but it’s pretty slowly anyway because it’s so convoluted. I’ll do my best. Hold my hand, we’re going in.
Round one. Every contestant has three “counters” which means they have the chance to answer three questions. A correct answer lets them drop a counter into the machine to try and knock down the counters inside. If the contestant decides there’s no chance of the counters in the machine dropping, they can make someone else drop a counter instead. It’s all so twisty turny! Wrong answers put counters into a bonus pot which someone will get to play with to knock more counters off ledges for more money. Each counter in the machine is worth £50. The person with the least money at the end of the round is eliminated.
Chris is first to buzz in to tell the host that Bambi’s friend Thumper was a rabbit. He opts to let Laura drop a counter because it’s too early for anything to drop. Laura chooses Drop Zone 2 (They call it a drop zone, it’s basically a mini plinko board, but who am I to argue with the brightest game show minds in the world?). To release the counter, Laura presses her buzzer and then we have 15 seconds of counters being moved backwards and forwards on ledges to look at. My blood pressure is through the roof right now. Anyway, Laura scores £100. “It’s exciting, isn’t it?” asks the host in a voice that sounds like he could not possibly be less excited. I wonder who he crossed to end up being offered this job.
Chris knows how many zeros there are in 1,000,000,000 and decides to drop a counter of his own this time. He opts for Drop Zone 1 and I can’t believe he’d be so foolish – drop zone 2 is clearly riper for counter movement. He scores nothing, as only one counter moves, and it doesn’t drop to the bottom. Oh the humanity!
Jo thinks “Mad Men” was set in the 1950s, and her counter is removed from her as punishment and dropped in the bonus pot. Caspian knows how many rings there are on the Olympic Flag, and wisely selects Drop Zone 2 for his counter. He picks up £100 and now everything is even more thrilling. Neck and neck!
I jump forward about 5 minutes to see what’s happening in the future. It’s still round one (no, really) and I’m just in time to see Caspian add £150 to his total. Jo, with no counters left and no money, looks to be in line for elimination, but don’t forget the twisty turny bonus of the jackpot pot… of counters. To win this, with a juicy two counters to play with, a question must be answered. The host tells Jo it’s not over yet, she has a chance, she can still win this! She can’t though, because Chris answers the question and takes the counters. Bye Jo. The round ends with Laura at £550, Caspian at £250 and Chris at £500.
After the commercial break, the podiums have been rearranged to cover the empty one where Jo left, like she was never there. Never there. Round two, thankfully, changes up the game. Each contestant gets 30 seconds worth of questions, with each correct answer earning a counter to play. Laura goes first and manages to answer one question. Not just “one question correctly” but “one question” – she passes on the rest. Still, her counter gets her £200. Chris is next up. He’s much better at answering things, and also follows up his answers with a cheeky smile. I’m warming to Chris. Except of course that his five correct answers mean we get to watch just over two minutes of the ledge machine.
I’m just going to jump ahead again now. Caspian has been eliminated, and his podium has gone too. We do not discuss eliminated contestants. Laura and Chris are now playing for £10,000 and there’s still 20 minutes of show to go. I feel that round three might last for infinity. Round three is six questions, each right answer awards (see if you can guess…) a counter to drop into the slidey machine. If a contestant doesn’t know an answer, they can throw it to the other contestant. If the other contestant doesn’t know the answer, the first contestant gets the counter. It’s so convoluted I can’t even understand how it all happened.
This round introduces computer graphics to say if an answer is right or wrong. It’s all a bit amazing, and I will certainly be needing a lie down at the end. “Is the answer… Shirley Bassy?” asks the host, looking off to the left like he can see some guy at a computer who will give him the thumbs up after a speedy Google. I’m feeling pretty bad for the host at this point – he’s trying to inject some excitement into what amounts to long shots of plastic counters being slid around on flat plates. I wonder if he cries at night.
Jumping forward another five minutes brings me to the end of round three, which Chris wins. He’s getting a chance at £10,000! I’ll point out here that the “money” the other contestants win on this show doesn’t actually exist, it’s just for scoring purposes. If they don’t make the final round, they get nothing.
The host is now waving a new counter around. It’s bigger, and it’s got a red star pasted to it. This is the jackpot counter. It’s bigger! It’s better! It’s got a red star pasted to it! I, personally, have reached fever pitch.
Now comes the bit that is in every single game show. “You might win this money, what are you going to do with it?” This lets the contestant discuss their plans to travel, or buy a car for their mother who only has one leg but has seven eyes, or donate it to a charity for children who feel like their heads are itchier than they should be. Chris wants to go to Machu Pichu, which would be a cool way to spend £10,000. Assuming he wins it, which he probably won’t because we’re back to the slidey machine.
For this last bit, which is the tense bit (you can tell because the music is all low key and the lights have gone down), the shiny red starry jackpot counter is dropped into the machine. Chris then earns counters with more answers to questions. With these counters he has to try and shove the shiny counter out of the machine.
Now, right now you’re thinking “Wow, after the twisty turny convoluted rules of the earlier rounds, round four is simple!” You’re wrong. Wrong! There’s six questions, on six different subjects. When he picks a subject, Chris can bet one, two or three counters that he knows the answer. The more counters he bets, the harder the question.
At least he’ll win some money either way. His total from the game is counted, plus the usual £50 per counter. This is like drinking Red Bull and then going on a roller coaster – I can’t take the thrills anymore. Chris drops the shiny counter down Drop Zone 4. It lands flat! Hurrah! Sometimes they land a little bit on top of another counter, you see, which means they’re not pushy enough. You care.
With a bet of three, Chris gets ready to drop three counters into the machine. Not all at once, that might make people over-excited. Nope. One at a time. Long, loving shots of a bunch of plastic discs swooshing gently back and forward. Soon, with some more questions, the shiny counter is almost over the edge! I’m dizzy!
The short version of this final round is this: Chris wins the £10,000 on his final counter. I’m actually, despite thinking this is the most tedious game show in history, pleased for him because he’s so nice. I’m also amused by the slow motion replay, because the whole show is in slow motion anyway.
Therein lies the boredom. I suspect the idea is that the audience will be on tenterhooks as they watch plastic discs being pushed over various edges. In reality, it’s a bit like watching paint dry, but with a shiny studio set around the drying paint.
The host makes a lot about “skillful drops” but again, the only skill in the drops is timing. After the timing is done to make sure the plastic disc lands when there’s room for it to fall flat, the rest is up to the plinko system of pegs. The contestants can’t see where the disc is at the top, so they can’t try anything interesting with the location (assuming it moves, it probably doesn’t). The host also talks a lot about “precious counters” so maybe he’s being paid in counters, and the bosses have brainwashed him to believe they’re valuable.
The show is 45 minutes long, and most of that time is spent with shots of the machine, which moves slowly so as not to jolt any counters around to much. There’s different camera angles, there’s a close up, there’s a shot from the side, there’s shots from above, there’s zooming but in the end it’s just plastic discs, swishing from side to side.
Personally, I’m waiting for “Claw,” the game where contestants answer questions for a shot at picking money stuffed toys out of a rigged claw machine. Your ideas for more tedious games are welcome in the comments.
Tags: Dire DVDs
- Leave a comment
- Posted under TV
March 20, 2014 Brackets
It’s deep into March, which means many folks are deep into the basketball brackets. I gave up on that years ago because it didn’t make much sense for me to pick teams based on their colors or where they were or what mascot could beat the other one. I never followed up at the end, anyway, so I finally decided to just knock it off.
But the beautiful thing about March Madness is that other people use it as a time to put out alternatives that are more exciting to me. So far there have been two pointed out to me that I want to pass along to you.
First is The Cage Fight. It’s Nicolas Cage versus Nicolas Cage, and I guess there’s even a chance to win some stuff. I don’t really understand how they’re determining the bracket winners, but maybe they’ll make that clearer as time goes on. I love the way this one works, and if I knew anything about web design and coding and what-have-you, I’d steal it to make brackets for other things.
Second is the Seinfeld bracket, deciding which episode is the best. This one will most likely be determined by the voting that’s taking place, I’d guess.
There you go! If you’re not a fan of college basketball, maybe these will be more fun for you. Let us know in the comments about any other ones you’ve run across.
- Leave a comment
- Posted under Internet, Movies, TV



