June 26, 2013 Batgirl
I recently started following Gail Simone on Twitter, mostly because a friend suggested I do so and because I saw several retweets from her that amused me greatly. [Twitter Tip: be amusing and friendly to get more Twitter followers!] I had no idea who she was before said friend told me she’d written for several comics, and I soon learned that she is currently writing Batgirl (and Red Sonja, and probably some other things). Furthermore, I learned that Batgirl #21, which came out very recently, is blowing people’s minds. Gail retweeted several people’s responses to her about it and it got me all very intrigued.
Here’s the thing: I don’t regularly read comics. I tend to keep up on comic news and major events, but usually wait to read collected stories in trade paperbacks or graphic novels, and even those I haven’t been reading as often lately. The aforementioned friend is usually my go-to guy for comics questions. So I asked him, “Hey, will I understand Batgirl #21 if I haven’t been reading?” and I tagged Gail (Ms. Simone? I don’t want to be too informal here) in the question, perhaps to solidify to him that she was the reason I was asking? I’m not sure. Not even a few minutes later, she responded with “It might be helpful to have issue 20 as well…it’s a two-parter.” Mind. Blown. [Twitter Tip #2: engage your followers and interact with them!]
So now I’m going to buy these comics, no question. We have three comics shops in town and I started calling. This was Monday, and apparently many comic shops are closed on Mondays. I’ve only ever been in two, so I didn’t know this. The one that was open had Batgirl #20, but not #21, but could order it, but it would take a couple of weeks to get in. I decided to wait until Tuesday and go check out the shop closest to me. That trip is a whole ‘nother entry, but the short version is they had both #20 and #21, so I bought them.
All of this is written before I’ve read them. The covers are kind of freaking me out, but I’m still game. I just thought that before I go into this I should write up my pre-reading thoughts and then come back and write some post-reading thoughts. So, before reading, this is what I know about Batgirl:
- She is Barbara Gordon, daughter of Commissioner Gordon
- A long time ago, in The Killing Joke, the Joker shot her and that crippled her (if you gripe to me about spoilers on a book that’s 25 years old, so help me I will drive to your house and box your ears)
- Unable to fight crime the way she was used to, she became Oracle, a source of information for Batman and a bunch of other superhero types.
- That’s… pretty much it
Another thing I know about DC in general is that they’re in the process (and have been for a while) of rebooting everything. So all this stuff I “know” about Batgirl is probably outdated.
So now there is a break while I read Batgirl #20 and #21.
* * * * *
And I’m back after #20.
- So Batgirl is still Barbara Gordon, so that’s nice
- She is battling The Ventriloquist, though she doesn’t actually know that yet. I mean, she knows there’s a ventriloquist that is doing the bad things and there was a fight, but she doesn’t know the ventriloquist is The Ventriloquist.
- Barbara has an eidetic memory, which fits with the previous version of Barbara I know. An Oracle would need to be able to bring up information super quick-like.
- Barbara is dealing with some major, major drama. There was a thing she did recently (last issue, maybe?) that has caused her some distress (and that is not a strong-enough word but I’m trying to be non-spoilery here). Honestly, it makes me want to read the whole run, and that’s the mark of some good writing, innit? Come into a story not knowing anything about it but now wanting to go back and catch up? I should be so lucky.
- I don’t really understand how/where Batgirl fits in with all of the other Gotham types. It appears she’s modeled after Batman, of course, but she’s not really affiliated? Doesn’t appear to be, anyway. But I’m guessing he approves or he wouldn’t let her carry on? I don’t know.
- Oh, and, hey, comics is violent. Not such a thing I’m worried about, but if you have young kids you probably want to know that, is all I’m saying.
- “That’s the thing about Gotham. Something awful is never far away.” So, so true. I’ve never been able to figure out why people live there!
On to #21!
* * * * *
And I’m back after #21.
- There’s this panel on page 3 (? they aren’t really numbered) that kind of breaks my heart. The look on Barbara’s face…
- She must be affiliated with Batman because Dick Grayson calls her and they talk about [previously mentioned drama stuff] and there’s a footnote referring to “Bat-family” things. Oh, and she’s got a sweet motorcycle that looks expensive, and her suit is probably not something you can just buy.
- I don’t know the Batgirl character, but I am very much intrigued. Huge difference between her and Batman: the stuff she has to go through in this issue is… well, “rough” doesn’t really do it justice. And she reacts much like you’d expect a human to react. Batman, see, he’d be all, “yep, that’s a thing that happened” and then he’d drop-kick the bad guy three different ways. [PLEASE NOTE: I am not trying to diminish the character of Batman. His ability to drop-kick a person three different ways is WAY COOL.] I’d react more like Batgirl did.
- There’s a part where Barbara needs to get into her dad’s files and figures out easily, and I’m guessing they’re laying the groundwork for Oracle stuff later on, but what do I know?
- I”m not going to tell you what happens, of course, so nertz to you thinking I would. Heck, I don’t even know that I completely understand everything that’s going on, anyway. I mean, I understand the main villain arc and all that, but there’s a lot of history going on that I see hints of but know completely.
Another thing that struck me while reading this is just how difficult it has to be to write comics, and I’m guessing that it’s even more difficult to write for ones that have huge histories. I just finished reading a two-issue story that stands on its own, but it also draws on stuff that happened before (and gives me just enough info to make me want to read all of it) and it lays the groundwork for future stuff. I get how people write books, but I don’t think I can quite wrap my brain around this. I’d guess you’d have to treat it like a really long novel, right? Map out what you want to have happen, draw in lines for issue breaks, that kind of thing. But I know that comics get different artists and authors over the course of their publication, so how do they continue these things? It all seems so complicated, and it’s something I never even thought about when I was a kid. My “grown-up” history with trades and graphic novels don’t really account for that since I’m getting the long stories edited together all at once, so this is kind of new info for me, even if it seems like something I should have realized. I’m just kind of blown away by the process, and that’s on top of the thrill of reading a pretty great story and enjoying some pretty great art.
So overall I’m going to say this was a dangerous exercise, because now I want to buy comics all the time. I want to know what got Barbara to where she is. I want to know where she goes from here. I want to see how this fits with the overall Bat-arc, which I don’t even know about, anyway! The amount of reading I will have to do to completely get up to speed here is daunting. I’d joke about getting a Cliff Notes version, but my English Minor hasn’t worn out completely just yet, and that kind of talk angries up the blood. Besides, thumbing through an actual comic book, back and forth, making sure I caught everything… man. I don’t even really know how to describe it. It was a combination of nostalgia and new-found joy, things I didn’t even know could happen simultaneously.
This could get expensive.
- 3 comments
- Posted under Books
June 25, 2013 Tuesday 10: Written By John Hughes
I need to be completely honest here: I’m not so sure this is a list I’m qualified to write. It’s inspired by my recent watching of The Breakfast Club, a movie my wife had never seen before. I didn’t remember liking the movie all that much when I saw it before, but I knew it was an Important Movie that she really should see. This time through I liked it a lot more, so it really is a candidate for that “Second Chance” series I really want to start doing.
The reason I don’t feel like I’m necessarily qualified to write this list is that there are several entries on it that I have not seen in 15+ years. I’m going on vague recollections and remembrances of feelings. How’s that for a rock-solid underpinning for an article, eh?
John Hughes movies tend to be remembered very fondly by most folks. I like a lot of his movies, but love hardly any. I’m sure many of you will have differing opinions in the comments.
10. Home Alone (1990) / Home Alone 2: Lost in New York (1992) – These are some of my wife’s favorite movies, but they’re really not my thing. I mean, I’m glad I saw them, but if I never see them again I’ll be okay. And, yes, I know Hughes wrote 3 & 4 as well, but I haven’t seen either of them.
9. Uncle Buck (1989) – I saw this movie for the first time only a couple of years ago, and it was fine. I wonder, though, if I had seen it a long time ago if I would rank this one higher? Most people mention this among John Candy’s best, I think I maybe just missed my window on it.
8. Pretty in Pink (1986) – I remember thinking that Andie and Duckie were just so very odd, but that’s what made this work, right? How many Blanes did you know in high school versus how many Duckies and Andies?
7. Some Kind of Wonderful (1987) – I barely remember this movie at all, but I remember my feelings about it, and they were mostly positive. I know it seems strange to make a list based on feelings, but it intrigues me just how many movies I have filed away like that in my brain. “I remember one of the girls was a drummer and I liked it.” If this site ever goes All Reviews, All The Time, it’ll be one-sentence reviews like that.
6. Weird Science (1985) – Here’s a reverse Uncle Buck: I really, really liked this one when I was younger, but I bet I wouldn’t like it much at all if I were to rewatch it now.
5. The Breakfast Club (1985) – I was surprised by how much I liked this one on rewatch. I’m mulling a full article on this so I won’t say much more right now.
4. Sixteen Candles (1984) – This one is on the “to be rewatched soon” list because my wife hasn’t seen this one, either. I’m curious to see if it will stay at this position on the list.
3. Ferris Bueller’s Day Off (1986) – Last year’s rewatch of this made me realize that this movie doesn’t hang together all that well. Don’t get me wrong, it’s enjoyable, but there are so many odd little things that seem to be randomly thrown in. Still, it’s fun.
2. Christmas Vacation (1989) – Speaking of “random things seemingly thrown in,” how about this movie, eh? I’ve liked this movie for a long time, but the most recent rewatch didn’t evoke the same joy and I don’t know why. Different enjoyments at different times in your life, most likely.
1. Planes, Trains & Automobiles (1987) – I doubt I’ll ever not like this one, though. This is my one certified “love” on this list.
Tags: Tuesday10
June 24, 2013 Better Off Ted S02E04: It’s Nothing Business, It’s Just Personal
Ted starts out the episode by stating he wants to keep his private life and his work life separate. Good luck with that, Ted. I mean, it’s not a bad idea, really, but it’s clearly not going to work. As if to underscore that, Linda immediately comes up to him and asks him about “that girl last night,” and mocks him for not being able to “close the deal.” On any other episode that would’ve seemed like normal Ted and Linda talk, but given Ted’s statement two seconds prior, it really does take on a weird vibe. The thought ran through my head, “You know, that is a weird thing for her to ask about.” Funny how injecting a bit of normalcy into a sitcom can make the whole construct come tumbling down.
It certainly seems like Ted’s going to stick to his convictions on this, though. I mean, we know he can’t because half the show would disappear, but for the sake of this episode, we believe him. Sure enough, though, Veronica’s falling asleep at work (and purring!), so something needs to be done. Again, in Normal World, maybe someone should have talked to Veronica instead of Ted interfering with Mordor, but here we are. Granted, Ted is aware that the whole situation is weird so us knowing it’s weird is addressed and okay. Enjoy the weirdness! The whole thing is very meta.
Mordor is a very passionate (another word for “lacking self control,” I think) man, so he does what he feels is logical, which leads to him getting shot by a spear gun, which leads to Ted being sequestered in the ridiculously tiny office, which leads to Ted discovering Mordor is a through-and-through cad, which leads to a fight, which leads to everything getting patched back up again. Standard stuff, really.
Phil and Lem, meanwhile, are unknowingly subjected to a Veridian experiment based on the finding that any change brings about harder work. The simple addition of a red lab coat throws them both seriously off, though it seems Phil takes it much harder than Lem. It’s a fun little throwaway B plot, and I’m always happy to see more Lonny.
Bits and pieces:
- Who is “that girl” Linda is asking Ted about? We don’t even hear her name.
- “I am not angry, I just need to know what’s happening.” – Phil
- Lem used to have a Fu Manchu, Phil misses it. ANybody with Photoshop skills want to show us what that might have looked like?
- Veronica purrs while taking cat naps. Ha!
- “Oh, man, are you gonna start growling now when you’re mad? Because that’s gonna be hard to adjust to.” -Linda
- “Maybe you two are boring. Have you ever thought of that?” – Veronica
- Veronica has an iPhone, which she spreads cream cheese on
- “Last week I helped my daughter build a house of Legos.” – Ted, using the wrong form of plural. Lego says the correct form is “Lego bricks” or “pieces.” The more you know!
- “I am fantastic to go out with.” – Ted
- “Man, capitalism blows.” – Linda
- “Can you imagine how great it would be to take Veronica out in the middle of the day and have lunch with her?” – Phil
- “Ya-ha” and “yangdoodle” and “boodle-doodle” – Linda’s mom’s words for naughty bits
- “You people are paranoid. No wonder the company has to secretly manipulate you.” – one of my favorite Veronica lines in the whole series
- The doctor jokes about not being able to save the spear, which leads Veronica to tell him not to make that joke anymore. WOuldn’t you like to see more of Veronica interacting with non-Veridian folks? I think that’d be awesome to watch.
- Ted’s bit of physical comedy and Phil and Lem trapped in the ridiculously tiny office when Linda comes in are some great bits
- I’ve never heard of Polly Pockets before
- “I like promiscuous sex far more than I dislike pain.” – Mordor
- “I think a loon would do exactly that.” – Ted, commenting on Mordor’s fighting style
- ‘Quad dela ron sha,” is an ancient Peruvian martial art involving painful and repeated slapping, its name means “leave, or we’ll start with the slapping”
- Veronica tending to Ted’s wounds, but doesn’t say “hey, move back up to your office.”
Commercial:
Again with the no commercial! It’s starting to become a habit.
Ideas/Inventions mentioned in this episode:
- Cheese that never spoils
- Super-fast spy pigeon (also wireless)
- Dieoxolater defibulation splung manifold (Lem broke it)
Coworkers named/seen:
- Patricia, who doesn’t say a word about her crush on Ted – is this the first time that’s happened?
- Lonny
- Ashley from Accounting – Mordor Conquest #1
- Tiffany – Mordor Conquest #2
- Chet gets mentioned, but unfortunately is not seen
Next week: S02E05 – The Great Repression
Tags: Better Off Ted, LWST
- Leave a comment
- Posted under TV
June 22, 2013 Ranking Polka Party
This is the fourth in a series of transplanted articles from my other blog. The transplants will run on Saturdays until they’re all over here. They are copied and pasted, but might get slight edits here and there.
In October of 1986 I was just a couple of months into being a freshman in high school and I didn’t have any idea who Weird Al Yankovic was. That didn’t stop him from releasing this album on the 21st day of that month.
This is actually a hard album to write about. There are no really big break-out songs, and the album itself was not received well and didn’t sell very well. I remember reading somewhere that Al wondered if this was it, if he was done. I’m sure that anyone who has chosen to reflect popular culture as his job would always have in the back of his mind “This can’t last forever.” I don’t know Al personally, but I can guess this was a difficult time for him. Of course, 26 years later we can see his fears were unfounded, but at the time I’m sure it wasn’t easy.
9. Toothless People – A parody of the Mick Jagger song, “Ruthless People,” the theme song for a movie by the same name. Never heard of it? I’m not surprised. This song is about people who’ve lost their teeth, whether through age or neglect.
8. Living with a Hernia – A parody of the James Brown song “Living in America,” which was on the Rocky IV soundtrack. I credit this song for fully 90% of my medical knowledge about hernias, including the names of several different types.
7. Dog Eat Dog – A style parody (sometimes called a “pastiche”) of the Talking Heads. This one’s set in an office and talks about office politics.
6. Here’s Johnny – The third parody based off a song from a movie soundtrack on this album! This one’s based on the El DeBarge song “Who’s Johnny?” but, as usual, this song supersedes that one. This one pokes a little fun at Johnny Carson’s sidekick Ed McMahon, while at the same time celebrating him.
5. Addicted to Spuds – Also better than the Robert Palmer song it spoofs, mostly because I, too, love potatoes.
4. One of Those Days – A series of unfortunate events befall Al throughout the day, with each next one getting worse and worse. Particularly bad? “I left my Beatles records out in the sun.” …though I guess the bomb being dropped and Nazis tying you up and covering you with ants would also be pretty bad.
3. Good Enough for Now – The following year after I did “One More Minute” for a talent show, I did this one. I couldn’t find someone to accompany me, so I borrowed a guitar and learned one chord that I randomly strummed at various times throughout the song. This one was not as well received – I think people thought I was talking about a particular person and took it as misogynistic or something. The chorus goes “You’re sort of everything I ever wanted / You’re not perfect, but I love you anyhow / You’re the woman that I’ve always dreamed of / Well not really, but you’re good enough for now.”
I think I was just ahead of my time, though, because a few years later (when I was overseeing the talent show), a couple of guys did this song again and it went over very well.
2. Polka Party! – If you’re a fan of 80s music, this is the polka for you: Peter Gabriel, Phil Collins, Madonna, Lionel Richie, Falco, and Tears for Fears. It’s a perfect summation of the decade!
1. Christmas at Ground Zero – You forget just how incredibly dark this song is because it’s sung in such a light and cheerful way. “Everywhere the atom bombs are droppin’ / It’s the end of all humanity / No more time for last-minute shoppin’ / It’s time to face your final destiny.” It’s pretty grim, and plays on the fears of a generation raised during the Cold War when the threat of nuclear war served as a backdrop to pretty much everything else. For all its grimness and darkness, though, I absolutely love this one, and I know I’m not alone.
We’re about 30% of the way through, folks! Nine more albums to do – but 10 or 11 if we count side projects and other things! I don’t know if we’ll handle those, but I can’t imagine not at least mentioning his version of “Peter and the Wolf.”
Tags: Weird Al
- 2 comments
- Posted under Music
June 21, 2013 James Gandolfini on Sesame Street
I don’t know what it’s like to be forever associated with one particular role. Leonard Nimoy initially was totally bummed about it but then came around to embracing it (actually, that seems to happen to a lot of Star Trek actors…). Outside of Star Trek, there is a short list of people so associated with a particular part that it’s almost impossible to separate them from it. While you might initially picture Marty McFly when you think of Michael J. Fox, it’s not difficult to see him in other things. Not so with Michael Richards, who will forever be Kramer (even Stanley Spadowski, in retrospect, is kind of a proto-Kramer).
Then there’s James Gandolfini. His passing this week has prompted many, many articles about his life and career, and the overwhelming majority of them talk about just how fantastic he was as Tony Soprano, somehow making a scary, unfaithful, violent, lying mobster likable. Really, what better tribute can you bring to an actor than to say his conic role was just that because he brought the character to life in a way no one else would likely have been able to? Sure, to his immediate friends and family he was a friend, a father, a husband, and all those other things people are, but to the vast majority of us, he was an actor who did a fantastic job, and we’re sad because of that connection. “Thank you for entertaining us, for bringing us joy,” is what we are saying when we’re sad about the death of an actor we like.
I discovered the following clip via Geekosystem. Though I’m a huge fan of The Muppets, I don’t follow Sesame Street much – there’s a kind of disconnect in my brain about it, actually, like the Muppets on The Muppets are one thing but Muppets on Sesame Street are a whole different thing completely. I don’t know why that is. Anyway, this clip delighted me even though I don’t know the particular Muppet in it, and I wanted to share it with you. Mr. Gandolfini is so much Tony Soprano in my mind that it’s hard for me to not think of this as being “Tony Soprano Visits Sesame Street,” but I really mean no disrespect in saying that.
- Leave a comment
- Posted under Movies, TV

